To help involve customers in important decisions, we created a Customer Engagement Framework. As part of this, we promise to keep customers informed about our progress and share an Action Plan every year. This plan is shaped by input from the Customer Scrutiny Panel (CuSP), our Leadership Team, and Board members.
September 2025 update
Below is an update from September 2025. It includes key priorities and includes updates from CuSP, the Leadership Team, and the Board.
Customer Engagement effectiveness review priorities |
|
High priority area |
September 2025 update |
|
Decision makers, technical experts and the colleagues involved in the issue being discussed to speak directly to customers, with support from the Engagement Team. |
|
|
Develop a range of methods to receive feedback and communicate outcomes. |
|
|
Have a standing agenda item for customer engagement at both Board and Senior Leadership meetings, attended by CuSP. |
|
|
Create a governance structure for engagement. |
|
|
Ensure clarity of purpose for all EDI information collected. |
|
|
Develop an engagement model and accompanying plan to use all data and feedback. |
|
|
Ensure senior leaders are visible and engage in a range of activities. |
|
|
Set a clear definition between general engagement and regulatory engagement to ensure all bases are covered. |
|
|
Use the results and the insight gathered to scrutinise areas of dissatisfaction, what makes the biggest difference to customers and what happens next. |
|
|
Implement a recommendation tracker for customer-led recommendations. |
|
|
Develop a robust communication plan and start testing methods. Important to ensure all customers feel included and informed. |
|
Suggestions and improvements |
|
High priority area |
September 2025 update |
|
More clarity on what we mean when we say ‘engagement is a collective responsibility’ |
|
|
More clarity on definition between general and regulatory engagement. Suggestion that general engagement could be referred to as ‘added value’ and ‘every day’. |
|
|
Additional emphasis on consistency of service, ownership and calling people back. |
|
|
More good practice sharing and positive role-modelling. |
|
|
Include something in Job Descriptions to capture the collective responsibility for engagement. |
|
|
Be visible about the budget for engagement and how it flows to front-facing services. |
|
|
More consideration of cultures and subcultures |
|
|
How could values link to culture? Use staff personal objectives. |
|
|
Create a joint panel for large projects that includes customers and an EDI assessment. |
|